The role of simulation training in ophthalmology
M J Labuschagne, MB ChB, MMed (Ophth), PhD (HPE)
to: M J Labuschagne (firstname.lastname@example.org)
The application of new learning technologies in medical education has escalated in recent years. Simulation is currently utilised globally for teaching, learning and assessment across all healthcare disciplines. In the past decade, medical schools have increasingly included clinical simulation technology in their programmes.1 Scalese1 uses the term ‘simulation-enhanced medical education’, which describes the role of simulation as enhancement of and supplementary to current curricula, but not replacing real patients. Michael Gordon, as quoted by Scalese, emphasised that clinical simulation for medical education should comprise the following three essential components: (i) curricula with clearly identified objectives and educational content; (ii) simulation integrated as a required component of the curriculum; and (iii) assessment as to whether the students have mastered the content and attained the objectives.
The use of simulation in medical education provides unique opportunities for increasing the quality of the educational experiences of students.2
In the Institute of Medicine report, To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System, it is recommended that team training programmes can improve safety, because people make fewer mistakes when they work in teams.3 Teamwork within a multiprofessional group is an essential complementary aspect of technical skills training to improve quality and patient safety. Simulation-based team training addresses the interrelated conceptual levels of team work, focusing on the learning needs at the level of the individual, the team, the organisation and the healthcare system, and it is advised that it should be incorporated into curriculum development programmes.4
Simulation in ophthalmology education and training can be used
for the training of undergraduate medical and healthcare
students and registrars specialising in ophthalmology, as well
as in continuing professional development (CPD).
High-fidelity human patient simulators can blink their eyes and have normal and abnormal pupil reactions. However, the specific training for ophthalmology will benefit more by using the simulators listed below. The various simulation modalities available are summarised in Fig. 1.
The use of a simulator, especially for the training of
fundoscopy techniques, is valuable for novices in eye
examination. Simulators that are available include a head with
eyelids that can be lifted, pupil size that can be adjusted and
different slides that can be used to simulate various retinal
conditions. These simulators are especially beneficial when
students start with fundoscopy training, as it can be quite
uncomfortable for real patients to be examined by numerous
students. These part-task trainers are also very useful for
assessing technique, and examinations are standardised by using
slides. Procedural skills simulation can be used to train
students to perform certain procedures, such as suturing a
cornea or eyelids, using skills trainers or organic animal
Flat screen simulation
Flat screen simulators include examination techniques,
e.g. visual acuity tests, colour vision, Amsler grid and tests
for astigmatism. Students can learn procedural and surgical
techniques using flat screen simulation. It can be
successfully employed for e-learning, where training sessions
use lecture slides that include audio-video enhancement, which
can be applied for content delivery. Clinical reasoning skills
can be developed with flat screen simulation. Assessment is
possible as long as security measures are built into the
Virtual reality can be used for the training of surgical skills and technical competencies. Simulators include surgical instruments and computer software allowing virtual operations, where students have the opportunity to practise certain aspects of surgical procedures repeatedly until they have mastered the operation or a part thereof. A virtual eye is mounted on a mannequin head and an operating microscope through which virtual images are projected. The computer allows accurate tissue response and provides realistic simulation of procedures, similar to the real procedures. The Eyesi Ophthalmic Surgical Simulator (VRMagic, Mannheim, Germany) is the only widely available model for medical simulation.5 These simulators are excellent for vitreo-retinal surgery training with the aid of the posterior segment training model, and for cataract surgery, using the anterior segment training model.6 The system has a touchscreen monitor, so that a supervisor may observe and offer feedback during the procedure. Patient safety and ethical aspects of practising on real patients are thus significantly improved. These simulators can be used for assessment and the computer software gives electronic feedback to the student and supervisor. The Eyesi Ophthalmic Surgical Simulator is shown in Fig. 2.
Virtual reality indirect ophthalmoscopes are available with pre-programmed virtual images of various retinal conditions to train registrars in the technique of indirect ophthalmoscopy, to recognise the pathology and to make retinal sketches.
Standarised patients can be used to train students in technical and non-technical skills. Technical skills include procedures such as fundoscopy, visual acuity and other diagnostic procedures. Training in non-technical skills is important, but can pose challenges to educators. The CanMEDS Framework, designed by Frank and Danoff,7 makes provision for the following seven roles of healthcare workers: (i) medical expert; (ii) communicator; (iii) collaborator; (iv) manager; (v) health advocate; (vi) scholar; and (vii) professional.7
Standardised patients are actors or collaborators who can be
trained to play the role of a patient, family member or
colleague. Certain skills and abilities, such as breaking bad
news, professionalism, team work, health promotion and
communication skills with patients, colleagues or other
healthcare professionals, can be trained and assessed by making
use of standardised patients. From another perspective,
standardised patients can be trained to assess the
professionalism and communication skills using a checklist
provided by the educator.
Simulation in clinical immersion
Simulation of the environment plays an important role in the
fidelity of a simulation. Therefore, simulation in clinical
immersion recreates the actual environment. The recreation of a
clinic or an operating theatre enhances the reality of the
simulation, which can furthermore be performed in an authentic
clinical environment. Vision simulators (made from spectacles or
safety goggles), simulating conditions such as cataract,
glaucoma, macular degeneration, etc., can be used to immerse
healthcare students into the experiences of visually impaired
patients, by asking the students to perform everyday tasks like
making tea or a sandwich.
The use of simulation as a required component of a curriculum improves clinical skills and competence and patient safety, and helps students practise in a safe, non-threatening environment to improve their skills and competence, resulting in shorter surgery times and fewer complications. However, non-technical skills will also be enhanced with simulation, because with debriefing activities educators can help students understand what happened during a specific scenario. This will result in changing students’ behaviour and explore personal and professional values in the context of their professional role.8
Ophthalmology training will benefit from simulation-enhanced education and training at both undergraduate and postgraduate level. Simulation creates opportunities for team training and reproducible, standardised, objective settings for formative as well as summative assessment. Simulation-based medical education provides opportunities for best practices in terms of care and training, error management and patient safety.9
Simulation offers a safe environment where students are allowed
to repeatedly practise a range of clinical skills without
putting patients at risk. Comprehensive simulation environments
allow a move away from isolated tasks to more complex clinical
situations, recreating many of the challenges of real life.
1. Scalese RJ. Energising medical education through simulation: Powering minds, not just machines. Singapore, 6th Asia Pacific Medical Education Conference Proceedings (APMEC), 2009.
2. Rosen MA, Salas E, Silvestri S, Wu TS, Lazzara EH. A measurement tool for simulation based training in emergency medicine: The simulation module for assessment of resident targeted event responses (SMARTER) approach. Simul Healthc 2008;3:170-179. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e318173038d]
3. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2000. http://books.nap.edu/html/to_err_is_human/exec_summ.html(2of34)12/4/2003 (accessed 11 October 2011).
4. Eppich W, Howard V, Vozenilek J, Curran I. Simulation-based team training in healthcare. Simul Healthc 2011;6(Suppl):S14–S19. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e318229f550]
5. Gillan SN, Saleh MG. Medical simulation in ophthalmology. Cataract & Refractive Surgery Today Europe 2012; July/August:34-36. http://bmctoday.net/crstodayeurope/2012/07/article.asp?f=medical-simulation-in ophthalmology (accessed 2 December 2012).
6. Mahr MA. The Eyesi Ophthalmic Surgical Simulator. Cataract & Refractive Surgery Today 2008; May:70-72. http://www.crstoday.com/PDF%20Articles/0508/CRST0508_20.pdf (accessed 2 December 2012).
7. Frank JR, Danoff D. The CanMEDS initiative: Implementing an outcomes-based framework of physician competencies. Med Teach 2007;29:42-647. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421590701746983]
8. Glavin RJ. Skills, training, and education. Simul Healthc 2011;6:4-7. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e31820aa1ee]
9. Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick S. Simulation-based medical education: An ethical imperative. Academic Medicine 2003;78:783-788. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888200308000-00006]
Full text views: 3157